CO129-261 - Public Offices & Others - 1893 — Page 473

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Presumably for Hanson did not give the three months notice of his intention to leave and had therefore been called upon to refund his passage money; but as he is not in this country and appears to be out of reach, and had been allowed one year beyond his tenure of five years, it hardly seems to be a case in which it would be advisable to claim a refund of the cost of his return passage for which he is liable.

He is residing in New York, and there is every probability that the claim, if made, would not be complied with, and, unless we wish it, I do not propose to take that direction.

No remittance on account of his leave salary have been made to Hanson since £21 on 10th March. Shall we keep it against his passage money, or let him have it as proposed in the last paragraph?

I have looked at the leave certificate, and it seems to me that he is entitled to his leave pay from the date of his departure, or other date as per the leave certificate.

(Pd. seems to be an annotation by the Crown Agents, but I am not sure from the context).

469

1488

20

7.

Edit History

2026-05-27 08:24:22 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Presumably for Hanson did not give the three months notice of his intention to leave and had therefore been called upon to refund his passage money; but as he is not in this country and appears to be out of reach, and had been allowed one year beyond his tenure of five years, it hardly seems to be a case in which it would be advisable to claim a refund of the cost of his return passage for which he is liable. He is residing in New York, and there is every probability that the claim, if made, would not be complied with, and, unless we wish it, I do not propose to take that direction. No remittance on account of his leave salary have been made to Hanson since £21 on 10th March. Shall we keep it against his passage money, or let him have it as proposed in the last paragraph? I have looked at the leave certificate, and it seems to me that he is entitled to his leave pay from the date of his departure, or other date as per the leave certificate. (Pd. seems to be an annotation by the Crown Agents, but I am not sure from the context). 469 1488 20 7.
Baseline (Original)
20 7. Presumably for Hanson did not jive the three months notice of his necessary intention to leave called up on to refund (and therefore might be the force but as he is not in this country and appears to be out of asho and had health, and Jerved м one year beyond his tenu of five years, Indon his passage money; hohen nothing it hardly seems to be a حمد Case in which it would be been called copon to be advisable to claim refund the cost of the refund his returi passah for which unser Lection/16 5. Mainance 14 spory he is liable. 1488 Конт is 469 is residing in New york there is every Mobability that the clavin), if made, would frot be complied with, and, unless wish it. I do not propose that direction. to talke action (that any 3 No regmention account of his leave salary have been Fee leave certificate. There made to Hanson a little fuel pay dire om 10 £21th March, Shall keep it QUA a set e passage money, de mou against or let have it as is oposed in the last par?? Alooked this orale of ashway (Pd seema by the brown Agents. but I are from the leave certificate to be that he is entitled to fuce hey from the , or othe 2 at gharch
2026-05-27 08:24:22 · Baseline
View content

20

7.

Presumably for

Hanson did not jive

the

three months notice

of his

necessary

intention to leave called up on to refund (and therefore might be

the force but as

he

is not in this country and appears to be out of

asho

and had

health, and

Jerved

м

one year

beyond his tenu

of five years,

Indon

his passage money;

hohen nothing it hardly seems to be a

حمد

Case in which it would be been called copon to be advisable to claim

refund the cost of the refund

his returi passah

for which unser Lection/16 5. Mainance 14 spory he is liable.

1488 Конт

is

469

is residing in New york

there is

every Mobability that the clavin), if

made, would frot be

complied with, and,

unless

wish

it. I do not propose

that direction.

to talke

action

(that

any

3

No regmention

account

of

his leave

salary have been

Fee leave certificate. There made to Hanson

a

little fuel pay dire

om 10 £21th March, Shall

keep it

QUA

a

set

e passage money,

de mou

against

or let

have it as is

oposed in the last par??

Alooked this

orale of ashway

(Pd

seema

by the brown Agents. but I are from

the leave certificate

to be

that he is entitled to

fuce hey from the , or othe 2 at gharch

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.